I was having lunch with three Pfeiffer professors on Monday and our conversation turned to their students. The professors remarked that their students are no longer impressed by their teachers the way these professors were in awe of their teachers growing up. Their students, they said, know that people have limited knowledge. Through technology (namely the Internet) they have access to more information than any single person could possibly hold.
And they said something I found fascinating.
Students don’t need information; they have that at their fingertips with technology. What they need to learn is how to process.
What if that’s true for worship as well? Has technology changed fundamentally the role of a sermon?
The model for sermons used to be about imparting knowledge. “Here is what this text means. This is what the author(s) originally meant. This word in the original Hebrew / Greek means…” And there’s a place for that. But is that what’s really needed in the church today? Are people sitting in the pews looking for facts? Is that the best a sermon can do?
Being the good 21st century Methodist that I am, I looked at Rev Adam Hamilton. Rev Hamilton is one of the best modern voices for Wesleyan thought / theology / preaching that I know. And I think he’s done a fair amount of thinking about stuff like this.
When he talks about preaching (especially to a group of preachers) he lays out two ways of creating sermons.
- Start with text. Examine it, exegete (fancy preaching word for “interpret”) it, and apply it to life.
- Start with life or the world. Examine it, exegete it, and apply the Bible to it.
This divide can be (roughly) seen in modern preaching between lectionary preaching and topical or series preaching. The lectionary is a three year cycle of suggested texts for every Sunday and major Christian holiday, designed to introduce a congregation to a range of texts. Series preaching is often designed by the pastor or worship team and can range from topics as wide as parenting or sex to the nature of good & evil.
Rev Hamilton does not hide the fact that he thinks churches do better with series preaching as opposed to the lectionary. That’s a discussion for another time. But it strikes me that the series model (#2) fits better with this sense of needing to know how to process rather than needing to know information. Now Rev Hamilton certainly teaches in his sermons. But the focus always seems to return to “here’s how to live in the world.”
And when we look at the Christian faith, that’s the kind of processing we need, isn’t it? We hope that our faith informs how we live in the world. Is that more of what people want? Is that more of what people need?
Now there are those who are quick to complain about the changes technology brings to our lives. I try not to be one of them, because technology happens whether we like it or not. And while this change may not be seen in every generation, I am willing to bet that it is more widespread that just the current student generation. Technology affects all of us. My parents are on Facebook. My wife’s grandparents use e-mail. This isn’t a change just happening within the younger generation(s).
So what do you think? Is what makes a “good sermon” shifting? Is the need a sermon fills moving in a new direction? And if so, how should churches adapt?
Read Full Post »